Flappy Birds and Adorable Rodents on the evolutionary scale
I have signed up to be part of the TTLB Ecosystem several month ago, and I have found my way up to be a Flappy Bird.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/415ac/415ac4ce5aacc71b41edc6b5a1ad2100041de5c4" alt=""
A Skeptical View of Alternative Treatments and Medical Misinformation, Pseudoscience, Myth, Conspiracy, Intelligent Design, Religion, Critical Thinking, Science and the Scientific Method.
I have signed up to be part of the TTLB Ecosystem several month ago, and I have found my way up to be a Flappy Bird.
People fall for all sorts of trickery no matter how absurd it is.
Really awful news about the death of a 5 year old boy:
A five-year-old boy with autism has died in America after flying from Britain for a controversial medical treatment for the neurological and developmental disorder.Chelation therapy is an intravenous treatment designed to remove heavy metals from the body.
....
Stephen Barrett, a retired psychiatrist and founder of the Quackwatch website, told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "Many doctors who treat children for autism claim they are suffering from mercury or lead toxicity. There is not sufficient evidence that autism is caused by mercury or lead toxicity." (Source: Autism boy dies after alternative therapy
Ghost world
The Prince of Wales is an eager advocate of alternative medicine.
He said: "It is highly selective in its use of evidence and it looks like the conclusions have been written before everything else. The Prince of Wales also seems to have over-stepped his constitutional role." (Source: News.scotsman.com)The Prince obviously tried to influence conclusions in the report, so it had to be secret.....
Will John McCain endorse Intelligent Design and give up his political principles - if that helps him get elected?
Evolutionary biologist Richard Sternberg made a fateful decision a year ago. It was sad too, to learn in the first time that the Smithsonian Institution anyway was showing the film on "Intelligent Design." A govermentsupported institution should remember where the money they get come from. Great many citizens does not subscribe to mythology or Christianity. It is time for rational people to take a stand on all fronts against Intelligent Design instead of letting UnIntelligent Design undermine the science of evolution.
In this article published in New Scientist: they ask what life would have been if some past event had turned out differently:
What if Newton had carried out his threat to quit science? What if Darwin hadn't sailed on the Beagle? What if Einstein hadn't found a job that allowed him so much time to daydream? The trouble is that until recently, the answer to these questions seemed to be disappointing: science would look much as it does today.The human understanding of science has changed over the time. In the 1990s there was a science war, and since then it has been acceptable and worth answering questions about Science like the one posed in the New Scientist.
Over at Slate they have a slide-show essay about Ernst Haeckel, 19th-century evolutionary theorist and subject of the new film Proteus.
The Prince of Wales's foundation for Integrated Health website provides information about the integration of complementary and conventional healthcare, including details of what we do, publications, conferences and seminars. (Source: www.fihealth.org.uk)The Sunday Times - Britain brings this interesting article about HRH and Quackery:
Charles’s "alternative GP" campaign stirs anger by Jonathon Carr-Brown, Health CorrespondentSince members of the Royal family are using alternative remedies like herbs "Liz" probably will become "associates" of the foundation. But what about other 100.000 medical docs?
PRINCE CHARLES has angered medical traditionalists by launching a campaign encouraging GPs to prescribe more "alternative" treatments to NHS patients.
The Prince of Wales’s Foundation for Integrated Health hopes to have signed up 150 GPs to the new and controversial scheme by October. Those who join will become "associates" of the foundation and are expected to offer a wide range of herbal and other alternative treatments to their patients.
..........
Edzard Ernst, professor of complementary medicine at Exeter University, said: "There is considerable danger in this initiative".
"The information the foundation puts out is dangerous and misleading. If it enters the realm of general practice it seems to me more like an attempt to brainwash GPs and patients."
The world known ABC anchorman and senior editor Peter Jennings died of lung cancer at 67. We've also heard that Superman's widow Dana Reeve has lung cancer.
Can one believe in God and the theory of evolution at the same time?
You can believe in God and evolution as long as you keep the two in separate, logic-tight compartments. Belief in God depends on religious faith. Belief in evolution depends on empirical evidence.(source: Why God's in a class by himself)The bottom line of the article by Michael Shermer is:
From Peerspectives I have learned about The Hitchhiker's Guide to Intelligent Design and how the parallels between the Adams' Babel Fish and ID theory are striking - The argument goes like this:
"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."I have never read The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy but it's an quite amusing way of using a Babel Fish.
"But," says Man, "The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. QED."
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn’t thought of that," and promptly disappears in a puff of logic.
"Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.
Most leading theologians claim that this argument is a load of dingo’s kidneys, but that didn’t stop Oolon Colluphid making a small fortune when he used it as the central theme of his best-selling book, "Well That about Wraps It Up for God."
Meanwhile, the poor Babel fish, by effectively removing all barriers to communication between different races and cultures, has caused more and bloodier wars than anything else in the history of creation.
From Skeptico I learned how to Google bomb ID: Write something skeptical about ID and phrase "Intelligent Design" as a hyperlink to the National Center for Science Education website as an attempt to place the NCSE's excellent article on "Intelligent Design" at the top of any Google seach using the phrase "Intelligent Design".
Herbal medicines and other therapies of questionable value aren't necessarily harmless.This article suggest that alternative medicine should have standards.
Two Canadians, including a Toronto man, have been charged in connection with foreign clinics that milked millions of dollars from desperate cancer patients by promoting an alleged cure based on magnets (from the article).I can't picture to myself the professional standards considering this, this and this? What is the big idea? Regulation will not provide any evidence.
The theory of evolution has overwhelming scientific support and it's standard and basic of all biological sciences (Palaeontology, Genetics, Zoology, Molecular Biology and other fields). There are no "major gaps" in the theory of evolution and fact is that Darwinism is accepted by every serious biologist in the world.
A scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable to fail. The theory of evolution, for example, postulates complex life arising from simple life. If the geological record showed otherwise — that the further one went back, the more complex life was, or that unrelated species repeatedly appeared as if from nowhere — that would falsify the theory.If someone wants to change the theory of evolution they need to come up with some hard Science to prove it. They can't because their arguments don't hold up.
Intelligent design implies that God did it. That may be true. Certainly, millions of Americans believe so. But intelligent design is not a scientific theory because there is no set of facts that would disprove it. No matter what science says tomorrow, a believer in intelligent design could say, "Yes, that's the way God did it."
Presidential science adviser John H. Marburg III, who told The New York Times that intelligent design "is not a scientific concept," said Bush believes it should be discussed as part of the "social context" in science classes.Teaching ID theory in classroom will introduce some kind of laissez-faire amongst students and it will undermine real Science. Students will not need any efforts to understand Science, they can just point to ID and say "Well, the Creator did it – I don't need to understand it", when something becomes to complicated.
that he believed schools should discuss intelligent design alongside evolution when teaching students about the creation of life. (latimes.com)Teaching ID at school is a sly way of sneaking religion into science education. It would be like taking Evolution out of Science by ignoring how it supports and is supported by the rest of Science. Real Science teaches you how, - not why like religion and ID does. ID doesn't belong to science.
Pair charged over fake cancer clinic - Patients paid centre $12 million - Over 800 people seen in Tijuana
Two Canadians — including one Toronto man — have been charged with running a fake cancer clinic that allegedly collected more than $12 million by offering dubious treatments to more than 800 patients.Continue reading the article.
At least 37 Canadians were treated at the Tijuana, Mexico, clinic.
It promised to reduce the number of cancerous cells in patients' bodies by using "pulsed magnetic fields" to heat up and ultimately kill tumours.
.....
A man from Toronto and another from British Columbia ran CSCT Inc., which used websites, brochures and alternative medicine magazines to offer "cell specific cancer treatment."
.....
The treatment cost $15,000 to $20,000 (U.S.) per person, and patients paid for their flight and accommodations in Mexico.
.....
Iron atoms in a magnet are crammed together in a solid state about one atom apart from one another. In your blood only four iron atoms are allocated to each hemoglobin molecule, and they are separated by distances too great to form a magnet. This is easily tested by pricking your finger and placing a drop of your blood next to a magnet.There's no scientific evidence to believe that magnetic fields will kill any cells or that cancer cells would respond differently than normal cells to a magnetic field because of accumulated iron.
If you have been attacked by Atkins diet and thought that weight loss could be achieved by following a low-carb diet, - you've been mislead.
It turns out the skeptics were right -- low-carb diets were a fad.If you continue reading the article you'll find that high-protein/low-carb diets are not a healthy way to lose weight.
The company that spawned the once wildly popular Atkins Diet has filed for bankruptcy protection in a New York courtroom. Atkins Nutritionals Inc. had been losing money hand-over-fist after dieters lost their appetite for its products.
It's a long way from the glory days, when a book by Dr. Robert Atkins spent 400 weeks on the bestseller lists and frustrated dieters everywhere were lured by the promise of losing weight while eating meat, butter and other typically verboten foods.
.........
A new(?) study on the power of suggestion found that people could be manipulated to believe they had once become sick of eating strawberry ice cream as children. That should help people on a diet not to eat the wrong food.
Ben Goldacre from The Guardian has encouraged anyone to "Answer the question" and so they did:
• Last week I asked: what's the most stupid thing anyone has said to you about science at a party? And it would seem that the great British sport of moron-baiting is more popular than ever. Lots of you encountered philosophers. Guy Davidson was told that "science doesn't tell you about the real world, only an ideal version of it". Yup. Well, light still travels faster than sound no matter how you look at it. Balthazar Florentin-Lee met someone who told him his discussion was flawed because it was "based only on logic" and someone whose email I lost got: "Logic isn't real, you can prove anything you want with logic. It's meaningless." Edwin Whiting was told that "science is how the devil perverts God's will" (bravo!), and the popular idea that "science is a way of life you choose just like religion" (via Yaniv Chen) perhaps explains why party philosophers then moved on to "not everything is scientific" (via Heather Bayley) and "science can't tell us everything" (via Conor McGeown). We never said it could.When stupid things are said about Science it possibly could be because of ignorance. Different categories of ignorance vary from pure ignorance to someone that shouldn't be ignorant. Pure ignorance could by example be people not believing in evolution because plenty of people have told them that evolution is against their religion. And nobody had ever told them what evolution really is.
See who links to your web
site. |